NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 37/61 BROADWAY Lot: 1 BIN: 1000808 33-41 Trinity Place
Document / 18 pages

Letter regarding air quality monitoring results, 111 Broadway, Feb 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

A letter from a property management firm submitting additional air quality monitoring results for 111 Broadway and Trinity Place to the DEP.

NYC-WTC_000105600–000105617

Folder label: “61 BROADWAY Lot: 1 BIN: 1000808 33-41 Trinity Place

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000105612
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Feb-1E-02 17:37 From-JONES LANG LASALLE +2123447012 T-033 P.09/13 F-052

-Tomasetti Engineers ThorntonThomton•Ibmasetti A Division of Tho Croup

SepLCmber 21., 2001

Mr. Kevin Ward General Manager Leasing & Management. JONES LANG LASALLE 61 Broadway, Suite 1407 New York, NY 10006

RE: 61 BROADWAY STRUCTURAL INSPECTION • T-T I'TtO&CT NO.: 21689

Dear Kevin: building at A team of Tlhomton-Tomasetti Engineers performed a visu it inspection.of the impact of 61 Broadway. The purpose of this inspection was to Clete -mine the structural the World Trade Center disaster on the primary structure 01 ()1 Broadway.

The team consisted of Paul Lew, P.E. and Christian 13eimp' e, Engineer.

The inspection included the basement and the roof. ' '.'he Moors' listed below were inspected as well as the basement and roof The inspect A' floors were as follows: 33, 31, 27, 23, 22, 19, 16, 14, ii, 8, 5 and 2 as well as the Iobb" and subway level. more A xnoxc'for )al.report will follow but this letter surnrnariz..:a the conclusions of the formal report to follow.' The report is limited to the prima, y structure; and does not make. any statement as to the interior ftnislles or ceilings ilia are .not . of the primary pat

structure.

visual structural inspection did not indicate that there were any signs of strocti*rally unsafe conditions in the btiil.dir}g. There .is some very united minor cracking in the Our

basement walls but these cracks appear to be pre-existi :'mg and not impacting on the structural integrity of the building. We have reached I tie conclusion . that. the minor cracking is pre-existing and not structural, in part, because there weie no noticeable signs of paint or plaster having fallen at the locations of cracking . or any other signs of diafress. • plaster and paint would typically occur if the crack had rec :ntly. occurred. The inspection , included inspecting the brick facade around the courtyan looking for cracks .at various levels in the brick. No cracks were found although there 1, as been previous repairs to the facade as would be expected of a building of this ago.

Based on these visual observations, the building is not in.s'i nictural distress at the present

641 Avenue of the Axnerieac + New Yo!k 14Y .1,0011-2014 a 212.741.1307) m 212.645.9236 fax - ww c7rEngineers.Com New York, NY R Newark, NI . TrurrilJvIi, CT Hosion, MA • ChkcAgo, IL :)atlas, TX . Orange County, CA x a

NYC-WTC 000105612

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000105612Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →