8 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.973
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Carpet mastic asbestos analysis results letter, December 2002
Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%Laboratory report on TEM analysis of carpet mastic glue samples from residential building common corridors confirming absence of asbestos.
NYC-WTC_000092671–000092734Folder label: “51 HARRISON ST 142/50”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
EMSLNYCNOBCHTFIELDSOP 200.0 Revison 1 February, 2002 3.0 SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample Preparation Acceptance 1. • More than 50% of-the grid must be covered by-the replica. 2. Grids must have at least 50% intact grid openings. 3. Grids must not have more than 10% opaque area due to incomplete filter dissolution. 4. Total Grid openings must have <50% overlapping of folded replica film 5. At least 20 grid openings with <5% holes and <5% opaque area due to incomplete filter dissolution. 6. Grid openings analyzed must not have rips or overlapping folds.
Bulk (Chatfield & NOB) 1. Remove the first sample grid from the box and insert it into the TEM. At a magnification of 300 to 500x, orient an intact grid opening on the middle of the screen. 2. Increase magnification to 3,000 or 19,000x taking care to remain in the chose grid opening. 3. Randomly scan the sample choosing fields with a moderate loading of debris. 4. Estimate the percent asbestos vs. the percent debris on each field. Ignore any fields that do not contain debris. Cover several areas of the filter in case of a non- homogeneous sample.
To better estimate the true percent, tilt the sample in order • to visualize a three-dimensional picture as a two-dimensional image may be misleading causing false high asbestos percents. 5. Calculate the average asbestos.concentration from all of the fields analyzed and record the estimated concenteration (for NYNOB) or the estimated range (for Chatfield analysis). 6:- If a fibrous structure has been located, check its morphology against.the morphologies for each asbestos type. If morphology is consistent with asbestiform fibers, proceed to EDX analysis. 7;;— Obtain an EDXof-the Semple by-fcfllowing-the-pro-cedures-outlined-in- ENERGY— DISPERSIVE X-RAY ANALYSIS SOP and compare it to the spectra for the asbestos types. Record the information on the sample worksheet. If the chemistry is consistent with one of the asbestiform minerals, proceed to Diffraction analysis. 8. Obtain a diffraction pattern for the sample by following the procedures outlined in DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS SOP. Record diffraction information on the sample worksheet. 9. If the morphology, diffraction, and 'EDX information match that of an asbestos type, then record the structure as asbestos. 10. For asbestos structures, there is no need to note fiber, bundle, matrix, or cluster. 11. Working magnification is 3,000 and 10,000 to 19,000x. 12. Fiber criteria - Estimate range percent of asbestos 13. Sizing of fibers - Not recorded • 14. Required EDX • - The first five structures and every tenth there after • 15. Required diffraction patterns
Controlled` Copy Page 4 of 7
NYC-WTC 000092682
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
No available related records indexed in this group.
Filed elsewhere
8 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗8 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000134683
Multi-page laboratory analysis report containing test results and signatures for environmental samples from 310 Greenwich Street.
21 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.968
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.967
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.966
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000109351
October 2001 TEM air monitoring inspection report for common areas and apartments at 310 Greenwich Street.
16 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.966
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗6 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.966
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.966
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000108315
Transmission electron microscopy air monitoring report for asbestos analysis at townhouses, November 2001.
16 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.958
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗4 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.955
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000139257
DEP official requests final review of the latest air monitoring Scope of Work to conclude negotiations.
Similarity score 0.960 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000125845
Draft fact sheet from DOH and DEP addressing tenant concerns regarding asbestos fibers at 105 Duane Street.
Similarity score 0.954 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139257
DEP official requests final review of the latest air monitoring Scope of Work to conclude negotiations.
Similarity score 0.952 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.951 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000149346
A chain of custody cover sheet for air monitoring samples sent to the EPA Region 1 laboratory in January 2003.
Similarity score 0.949 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.949 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000092667
Laboratory report showing pesticide and PCB analysis results for sample AD26474 collected November 5, 2001.
Filed in the same folder
NYC-WTC_000092670
Air sample log for 51 HARRISON STREET (11/6/2001–11/7/2001) lists apartment tests and states no suspicious materials were found.
Filed in the same folder
NYC-WTC_000092735
Supporting DEP page for the 51 HARRISON STREET lot 142/50 file, likely part of an inspection or testing packet with unclear printed text.
Filed in the same folder
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content