NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 65/524 6/3/02
Document / 66 pages

VOC analysis results, sample AE12737, June 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Laboratory report for volatile organic compounds in sample AE12737 analyzed on June 3, 2002.

NYC-WTC_000083807–000083872

Folder label: “524 6/3/02”

←Page 3 of 66→
Mirrored PDFOfficial City PDF ↗
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000083809
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document Quantitation Report (Not Reviewed) Data File C:\HPCHEM\l\DATA\02JUNE3\0603Bl .D Vial: 2 Acq On 3 Jun 2002 10:31 am Operator; 201-wb Sample lab blank Inst : GC/MS Ins Mise Multiplr: 1.00 MS Integration Params: GAS6.P Quant Time; Jun 3 13:31 2002 Quant Results File; HP052902.RES Quant Method : C:\HPCHEM\1\METHODS\HP052902.M (RTE Integrator) Title : VOCs BY EPA METHOD 524 Last Update ; Fri May 31 14:34:13 2002 Response via : Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth : HP052902

Internal Standards R.T. Qlon Response Cone Units Dev(Min) 1) 1,4-DIFLUOROBENZENE 15.09 114 1598552 5.00 ug/L -0.02 24) CHLOROBENZENE-D5 21.75 117 1447505 5.00 ug/L 0.00 52) 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE-D4 26.93 152 700027 5.00 ug/L 0.00 System Monitoring Compounds 2) 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE-D4 14.32 65 654110 4.53 ug/L ■ -0.02 Spiked Amount 5.000 Recovery = 90.60% 3) 4-BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 24.32 174 567227 4.46 ug/L -0.02 Spiked TUnount 5.000 Recovery = 89.20% 25) TOLUENE-D8 18.45 98 1891761 5.19 ug/L -0.02 Spiked Amount 5.000 Recovery = 103.80% Target Compounds Qvalue 12) ACETONE 8.22 43 4138 0.25 ug/L 51 14) METHYLENE CHLORIDE 9.59 49 7610 0.07 ug/L 94

(#) = qualifier out of range (m) = manual integration 0603B1.D HP052902.M Mon Jun 03 13-.31:45 2002 Page 1

NYC-WTC_000083809

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000083809Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →