NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 27/GCMS X 4/15/02 A 4/22/02
Document / 11 pages

GCMS analysis results for sample AE08937, April 29 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Laboratory report documenting GCMS analysis of sample AE08937 conducted on April 29, 2002, showing surrogate recovery.

NYC-WTC_000049213–000049223

Folder label: “GCMS X 4/15/02 A 4/22/02”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000049215
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document Quantitation Report (QT Reviewed)

Data File : C:\MSDCHEM\1\DATA\042202\8937.D Vial: 10 Acq On : 22 Apr 2002 6:32 pm Operator: Bohlk Sample : SAMPLE 8937 4/15/02, FB Inst : Instrumen Mise 1 Multiplr: 1.00 MS Integration Params: BENZO.P Quant Time: Apr 25 14:35:32 2002 Quant Results File: 5080402BBC.RES Quant Method : C:\MSDCHEM\l\5973N\5080402BBC.M (RTE Integrator) Title : Quantitation For Method 508gcscan Last Update : Wed Apr 24 11:07:03 2002 Response via : Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth : 508SCAN

Internal Standards R.T. Qlon Response Cone Units Dev(Min)

1) l,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 9.41 152 371437 40.00 ug/L 0.00 10) Naphthalene-d8 12.89 136 1791862 40.00 ug/L 0.00 17) Acenaphthene-dlO 17.99 164 1010526 40.00 ug/L 0.00 30) Phenanthrene-diO 22.34 188 1382196 40.00 ug/L 0.00 39) Chrysene-dl2 30.14 240 1044145 40.00 ug/L -0.01 45) Perylene-dl2 34.01 264 594228 40.00 ug/L 0.00

System Monitoring Compounds 28) TCMX (SURR) 19.95 244 28940 7.18 ug/L 0.00 Spiked Amount 10.000 Recovery = 71.80% 38) 2,4-DDD (SURR) 0.00 235 0 0.00 ug/L Spiked Amount 10.000 Recovery = 0.00%

Target Compounds Qvalue 2) N-nitroso-dimethyl amine 0.00 74 0 N.D. 3) bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 0.00 93 0 N.D. 4) 1,3 - Dichlorobenze 0.00 146 0 N.D. 5) 1,4 - Dichlorobenzene 0.00 146 0 N.D. 6) 1,2 - Dichlorobenzene 0.00 146 0 N.D. 7) 2,2 1 - oxybis (l-Chloropr 0.00 45 0 N.D. 8) N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 0.00 70 0 N.D. 9) Hexachloroethane 0.00 117 0 N.D. 11) Nitrobenzene 0.00 77 0 N.D. 12) 1sophorone 0.00 82 0 N.D. 13) bis(2-Chloroethoxy) methan 0.00 93 0 N.D. 14) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.00 180 0 N.D. 15) Naphthalene 0.00 128 0 N.D. 16) Hexachlorobutadiene 0.00 225 0 N.D. 18) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 0.00 237 0 N.D. 19) 2-chloronaphthalene 0.00 162 0 N.D. 20) Dimethylphthalate 0.00 163 0 N.D. 21) 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.00 165 0 N.D. d 22) Acenaphthylene 0.00 152 0 N.D. 2 3) Acenaphthene 0.00 153 0 N.D. 24) 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.00 165 0 N.D. 25) Diethylphthalate 0.00 149 0 N.D. 26) 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ethe 0.00 204 0 N.D. 27) Fluorene 0.00 166 0 N.D. 2 9) Azobenzen/ 1,2-Diphenylhyd 0.00 77 0 N.D. 31) N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 0.00 169 0 N.D. 32) 4-Bromophenyl-phenyl ether 0.00 248 0 N.D. 33) Hexachlorobenzene 0.00 284 0 N.D. 34) Phenanthrene 0.00 178 0 N.D. 35) Anthracene 0.00 178 0 N.D. 36) Di-n-butylphthalate 0.00 149 0 N.D. 37) Fluoranthene 0.00 202 0 N.D. 40) Pyrene 0.00 202 0 N.D. 41) Butylbenzylphthalate 0.00 149 0 N.D. 42) Benzo (a) antracene 0.00 228 0 N.D. 43) Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthala 0.00 149 0 N.D. d 44) Chrysene 0.00 228 0 N.D.

(#) = qualifier out of range (m) = manual integration 8937.D 5080402BBC.M Thu Apr 25 14:36:29 2002 Page 1

NYC-WTC_000049215

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000049215Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

GCMS analysis results, sample AE08956, April 2002 · Box DEP Box 27

NYC-WTC_000049288

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of environmental sample AE08956 conducted on April 29, 2002, detecting unknown compounds and 2,4-DDD surrogate at 79 micrograms.

1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.996

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →