Copies and versions
← Back to recordCopies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.
- GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29231, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036151
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29234, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036092
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29287, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036126
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28970, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035651
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29189, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036103
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29134, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035865
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS sample analysis AD29456, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036300
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS sample analysis AD29296, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036278
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis results sample AD29462, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036480
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29141, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035831
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS sample analysis AD29295, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036267
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis results sample AD29461, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036469
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29139, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035853
· similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29230, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036114
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis results sample AD29297, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036380
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis report sample AD29229, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036325
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS sample analysis AD29455, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036289
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS sample analysis AD29294, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000036255
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28971, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035629
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28969, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000035618
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS analysis results for sample AD30112, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16
NYC-WTC_000016726
· similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS comments for sample AD28273, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000034235
· similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗ - GCMS comments for sample AD28595, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22
NYC-WTC_000034759
· similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
Selected filing
GCMS re-analysis results, Sample AD28596, December 2001NYC-WTC_000034908
Repeat gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of sample AD28596 after re-extraction, confirming bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate at 0.36 ug/L with improved standard recovery of 89
Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 22
Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing
GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29231, Dec 2001NYC-WTC_000036151
Laboratory report noting GCMS scan results for sample AD29231 with phthalates detected and low recovery requiring re-analysis.
Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 22
Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.
