NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.5.1
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 21/GCMS X 11/20/01 A 11/26/01
Document / 11 pages

GCMS unknowns analysis results for sample AD28229, Jan 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Laboratory report documenting GCMS analysis for unknown compounds and surrogate recovery in sample AD28229 conducted on January 9, 2002.

NYC-WTC_000033954–000033964

Folder label: “GCMS X 11/20/01 A 11/26/01”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000033964
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Tentatively Identified Compound (LSC) summary

Operator ID: 209 GALOS Date Acquired: 28 Nov 2001 6:57 am Data File: C:\HPCHEM\1\DATA\NOV2601\28229.D Name: 11/20 scan Mise: Method: C:\HPCHEM\1\METHODS\GCMS1126.M (RTE Integrator) Title: 209 625/TCLP calibration table Library Searched: C:\DATABASE\NBS75K.L

TIC Top Hit name RT EstConc Units Area IntStd ISRT ISArea ISConc

1,4 Dichlorobenzene- 11.56 0.5 ug/1 152645 ISTD01 11.69 5805700 20.0 3 - Isopropoxy- 1,1,1,7 39.59 0.7 ug/1 80854 ISTD06 37.11 2168100 20.0 3 , 6-Diexa-2,4,5,7-te 41.53 0.9 ug/1 101588 ISTD06 37.11 2168100 20.0

28229.D GCMS1126.M Thu Jan 03 12:46:16 2002

NYC-WTC_000033964

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000033964Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

GCMS comments for sample AD28151, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

NYC-WTC_000033789

Analytical commentary for sample AD28151 dated November 29, 2001, noting no unusual compounds but low recovery rates for LCS standards.

1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.998

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →