NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 21/GCMS X 11/20/01 A 11/26/01
Document / 11 pages

GCMS analysis results for sample AD28145, Nov 2001

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Laboratory report detailing GCMS analysis of sample AD28145 conducted on November 29, 2001, noting unknown compounds.

NYC-WTC_000033731–000033741

Folder label: “GCMS X 11/20/01 A 11/26/01”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000033732
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Comments for Sample AD28145 - Analysis $GCMS Westchester Dept, of Labs & Research User: Vinci, David L Date: 11-29-2001 Time: 09:45:13

The GCMS scan, from 35 to 550 amu, reveals the unconfirmed presence of 2-Ethyl-1 -hexanol, with a probability fit of 86 out of 100; and 4,4‘-(1-methylethylidene)bis-phe ol with a probability fit of 94 out of 100. Their estimated levels are 0.8 ug/L and 0.5 ug/L respectively. Recoveries for 14 of the 44 compounds in the LCS Standard were outside of their acceptance ranges. The recovery for the Surrogate Standard in this sample was 85%.

NYC-WTC_000033732

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000033732Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

GCMS comments for sample AD28151, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

NYC-WTC_000033789

Analytical commentary for sample AD28151 dated November 29, 2001, noting no unusual compounds but low recovery rates for LCS standards.

1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.997

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →