Copies and versions

Copies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.

• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019090

  · similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019111

  · similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019081

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis report, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016625

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29089, December 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036000

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019061

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016699

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31465, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018385

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30109, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016854

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results, sample AD30315, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019163

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28898, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035683

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30113, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016717

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29024, Dec 18 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035909

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019121

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29028, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035990

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29022, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035820

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results, sample AD30022, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016708

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29140, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036029

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28966, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035598

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD28968, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018026

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30086, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016746

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis summary, sample AD31375, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016159

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019070

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30087, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016737

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31347, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016232

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30108, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016835

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30009, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016816

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS blank analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016681

  · similarity 0.994 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Selected filing

GCMS analysis results, sample AD30255, January 2002

NYC-WTC_000019153

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis report for sample AD30255, completed January 9, 2002, showing 2,4-DDD surrogate compound data.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 16

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing

GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002

NYC-WTC_000019090

Laboratory report of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis for sample AD30254 conducted on January 9, 2002.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 16

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.