NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 12/GCMS X 2/11/02 A 2/13/02
Document / 3 pages

GCMS document fragment from DEP Box 12, Feb 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 85%

Fragmented page from a Department of Environmental Protection GCMS file containing sample identification data from February 2002.

NYC-WTC_000005744–000005746

Folder label: “GCMS X 2/11/02 A 2/13/02”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000005744
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

00 Method mod R6 Date Extracted_S ) Pago 78 re- ex+s Lab# Description Sample vol/wt Drip rate ml/min Surr add add IS add Final T.V. vol. pos. —C ICount I I

00 GOOwL L I„L 1 dmt J 31002 31063 00000 40Ont 30645-’” 600ml i IB 3004) 0 /A 314LO t

Remarks 30645 „ancl L3002-7 C 2 - L — & A Ae , £2 b—dnga mi 04_ XCCH - O, L te * Oac K _

drip rate must be between 5-15 ml/min for liq-liq extractors drip rate -________ J___________ Extraction type-S4P Tw Solv.lot# VIA) |NaCI lot# V396 / 8 Na2S04 lot# V397oo STANDARD INT STD LOG# CALIBRATION REF/SPIKE MDL/MDRF WB: Q. CHECK Reviewed by INT. STD.IS 0) hwl SURROGATE 00/02 6/7* LPC ENDRIN/DDT

Analyst Reviewed by revision 4/12/01 Verified by Date

NYC-WTC_000005744

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000005744Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

DEP GCMS data table, Jan-Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 12

NYC-WTC_000005147

Multi-page laboratory data sheet containing sample analysis results and metadata for DEP GCMS records from January to February 2002.

1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.990

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →